One segment of society is very familiar with the slippery slope.
Tag: smoking ban pros and cons
Always Share (A Link), #4
Any honest person looking even just a little deeper beyond the mainstream narrative would agree.
Smoking History Lesson, #2: The 1500s
If anti-smokers are just after smokers "for their own good," why have they been at it since before anyone knew it's "bad" for you?
Junk Science, #4: The Secondhand Smoke Fraud – Guesswork and Hearsay
There are no measurements of exposure, there is no lab work, no experiments, and never any proof.
Did You Know? #2
In 1961, nearly 70% of all males in the United States over the age of 18 were smokers. Just over a decade later, the World Health Organization decided to make them pariahs by way of "secondhand smoke," despite having no studies to back up their claims. This content is for members only. $2 gets you … Continue reading Did You Know? #2
Groups Behaving Badly, #2: The U.S. Surgeon General
The SG's recommendations are partly responsible for many smoking bans throughout the U.S. It's imperative, then, to take a closer look.
Junk Science, #3: Unfounded Scares About Secondhand Smoke
Anything is toxic or carcinogenic if the dose is large enough.
Groups Behaving Badly #1: The Pharmaceutical Connection
Anti-smoking groups like the American Cancer Society fight to restrict the freedoms of smokers using millions of dollars from pharmaceuticals--an industry whose products, overall - when taken as prescribed - kill one American every five minutes. And many are said to cause cancer!
Junk Science #1: The World Health Organization Didn’t Only Lie About COVID.
Covid is far from the first time the WHO has been engaged in a potential cover-up. The organization has numerous ties to the pharmaceutical industry, which profits from policies such as smoking bans.
FumaClub 