Any honest person looking even just a little deeper beyond the mainstream narrative would agree.
One of Britain's top experts on the effects of smoking insists it's fine to smoke 10 cigarettes a day, passive smoking is no problem, and the government is wasting money telling people to quit.
The people today who believe wearing a mask matters because someone on TV told them so without proof... ...are the same people who yesterday believed secondhand smoke kills others because someone on TV told them so without proof. This content is for members only. $2 gets you unlimited access to complete articles, archives, images, videos, … Continue reading Think About it, #3
VIDEO: Pharmaceuticals create allegedly cancer-causing products, yet are largely responsible for almost every anti-smoking and anti-vaping measure.
If anti-smokers are just after smokers "for their own good," why have they been at it since before anyone knew it's "bad" for you?
Though staunch anti-smokers themselves, Enstrom and Kabat were also principled, and refused to back down when it became apparent that secondhand smoke did not pose mortal danger to nonsmokers.
Sackstark.info - A german site (Google will let you translate) discussing the secondhand smoke fraud, junk science, and other related topics. This content is for members only. $2 gets you unlimited access to complete articles, archives, images, videos, data, and a wide array of additional resources. Log in
There are no measurements of exposure, there is no lab work, no experiments, and never any proof.
In 1961, nearly 70% of all males in the United States over the age of 18 were smokers. Just over a decade later, the World Health Organization decided to make them pariahs by way of "secondhand smoke," despite having no studies to back up their claims. This content is for members only. $2 gets you … Continue reading Did You Know? #2
We now live in an America where the troops who waded through hell storming the beaches of Normandy to help restore liberty to Europe are not even allowed to smoke in their own private veteran's halls. And based on phony lobbyist science, no less. How would these men have felt had they been told about the future of their country?